Western Digital / SanDisk

Western Digital WD Blue SN550

PCIe M.2 · PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 · Polaris MP16 (4-channel)

PCIe M.2 2019 5-year warranty 250 GB – 2 TB
Western Digital / SanDisk Western Digital WD Blue SN550
Specs & Capacities

Specifications

General specifications
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.4
ControllerPolaris MP16 (4-channel)
NAND TypeBiCS4 (96L TLC)
DRAM CacheN/A (HMB)
Warranty5 years
Active Power0.075 W
Idle Power0.005 W
250 GB specifications
Seq Read2,400 MB/s
Seq Write950 MB/s
Rand Read165,000 IOPS
Rand Write160,000 IOPS
Endurance150 TBW
Part NumberWDS250G2B0C
Editor Notes

Overview

The WD Blue SN550, launched in late 2019, is the successor to the WD Blue SN500. It uses WD's in-house Polaris MP16 controller—a four-channel DRAM-less design relying on Host Memory Buffer (HMB)—paired with BiCS4 96-layer 3D TLC NAND. Sequential read peaks at 2,400 MB/s across all capacities; write ranges from 950 MB/s (250GB) to 1,950 MB/s (1TB). Available in 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB with a 5-year warranty.

In 2021, Western Digital switched some production units to QLC NAND without announcement; QLC variants showed lower sustained write performance. After the change attracted widespread criticism, WD acknowledged the issue and offered to replace affected units with TLC versions. The successor WD Blue SN570 (2021) upgraded to BiCS5 112-layer TLC NAND, with WD stating publicly it would maintain TLC throughout the product's production life.

External Reviews

Reviews

  • “If you're looking for a quick boot drive or just a speedy but cheap SSD to store your data, you don't have to look any further. WD's new Blue knocks it out of the park on performance and price.”

    Tom's Hardware

  • “Though the SN550 showed less than stellar results (with the exception of its impressive sequential read performance), the price-per-GB is really hard to beat for an NVMe drive. Moreover, those using the drive for general usage, casual gaming and upgrading from SATA-based system won't see much of a real-world performance difference compared to higher-end drives.”

    StorageReview